Global warming

  • 17 Replies
  • 437 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fraktalist

  • *
  • Administrator
  • *******
  • Strange Attractor
  • Posts: 1157
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2020, 09:54:48 PM »
the question is, do you prefer to believe "a commentor of my latest blog article did the research and found that it's 1.6% consensus, not 97%"
or would you rather listen to:

Academia Brasiliera de Ciências (Bazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academié des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy Council of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Royal Society of the United Kingdom (RS)
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
American Meteorological Society (AMS)
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS)

who all officially are part of the "non existing" consensus..
https://grist.org/climate-energy/there-is-no-consensus/

you can find every opinion "proven" online. indeed the difficulty is to find out which is true..

Offline Tas_mania

  • *
  • Fractal Friar
  • *
  • Posts: 125
    • West Tamar Talk
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2020, 10:56:02 PM »
If 'climate change' is 'human induced' then look at the World Population Clock?
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
Sure enough there are well over twice as many births than deaths every day.
So how many humans are too many on a limited planet?

I'm surprised that nearly 100% of World leaders are unable to name a figure on the carrying capacity of Planet Earth.
Yet these are the people who spend their lives 'managing' everything?

I know for sure that 1.4 billion Chinese people have to build a global empire just to survive. India is right behind them and soon the footprint of just 2 countries will cover half the planet. So lets go back to sleep like Neville Chamberlain did in 1939. Your going to die whether you are informed, uniformed, ultra smart or ultra dumb.


Offline 3DickUlus

  • *
  • 3f
  • ******
  • Posts: 1448
    • Digilantism
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2020, 02:08:15 AM »
...we need a BS vs TRUTH button on every page of the internet, and when the BS button gets hit too many times the page gets deleted, however, simply due to human nature that idea would fail because the wrong stuff would get deleted as it would be exploited by personal and corporate reasoning.

( nothing to do with global warming but everything to do with human behavior patterns that lead us to this current state, mostly caused by greed )
Fragmentarium is not a toy, it is a very versatile tool that can be used to make toys ;)

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Fractals/fragmentarium


xx
MC Global Illumination in Mandelbulber

Started by buddhi on Fractal Image Gallery

4 Replies
179 Views
Last post August 02, 2018, 03:48:56 AM
by mclarekin