Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Meet & Greet / Hey there
« Last post by FragmentedPoet on Today at 05:28:00 AM »

New here and looking forward to learning more about making better fractals.

I've been (attempting) to work with a couple of fractal programs for the past few years - mostly Chaotica. Recently I purchased Ultra Fractal and I adore it. I'm hoping to pick up some skills!


Image Threads / Re: et
« Last post by gerrit on Today at 04:40:24 AM »
An exciting development!
Image Threads / Re: gerrit images
« Last post by gerrit on Today at 04:09:39 AM »
Based on dynamics of double pendulum.
Image Threads / Re: gerrit images
« Last post by gerrit on Today at 04:09:10 AM »
Embedded Julia in rational map.
Image Threads / Re: Lyapunov fractals
« Last post by ThunderboltPagoda on Today at 01:32:37 AM »
Hi Gerson,

here are two more in the vein of 5b05ee20c6a7b783208d4f0248267404.jpg
Image Threads / Re: et
« Last post by claude on Yesterday at 10:48:00 PM »
there was some confusion above, but I got it working with case analysis on quadrants of diffabs().  will write a blog post later this week.  one test location 640x360 goes from 97s with perturbation alone to 35s with order 3 series approximation skipping about 1k iterations.  with log de colouring the grain is different, but the overall shapes are similar enough (I hope...)
Fractal Humor / Re: Fibonacci is always right..
« Last post by Walt F on Yesterday at 10:26:11 PM »
The only "stable genius" I know of was Mr. Ed - he lived in a stable, and for a horse he was pretty damned smart.
Meet & Greet / Hi from a Fractview lover!
« Last post by Walt F on Yesterday at 09:37:57 PM »
I've recently acquired Fractview on my phone and I'm really amazed at how great it is. It's just the kind of thing I was hoping to find, and even better than I expected. I'm no math whiz, though, so I'll have to do a bit of work to understand how to use it to it's full potential. I'm so glad there's a forum so I can learn more about it.
Image Threads / Re: zm49 (Stars)
« Last post by CFJH on Yesterday at 09:16:24 PM »
8x4Stars (at E23161)
Image Threads / Re: et
« Last post by gerrit on Yesterday at 06:19:34 PM »
I think that could work. Whenever perturbed orbit x is smaller than ref. orbit X (|x|<|X|), |X+x| = sign(X)*(X+x), no abs values involving x (which will become polynomial in c).
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10